American Management Association logo
Home Register Member FAQ’s Your Member Account About AMA
Seminars On-Site Events Books e-Learning Self-Study Research Conference Centers
   
  Areas of Interest
  HR/Training
  Management
  Leadership
  Sales and Marketing
  Small Business
  Global Perspectives
  Professional Development
  Archive
  Member Benefits
  Membership Plans
  Association Partners
  Member Resources
  Self-Assessments
  Member Newsletter Archive

The 1994 Violence Against Women Act: An Important Concern for Employers

by Mary-Kathryn Zachary, J.D.

HR managers and others concerned with the rights of their employees may want to incorporate discussion of this Act into supervisory training programs.

The Violence Against Women Act states:

  • All persons have a right to be free from violent crimes based on gender.
  • people who violate that right are subject to penalties, including compensatory and punitive damages.
  • To support valid claims, victims must show that they were subject to violent crimes motivated by their gender.
  • The crime must be one that would be considered a felony in criminal law and involve the threat of physical force.
  • Random acts of violence not motivated by animus based on gender are not covered under the statute.

Three recent workplace-related claims invoking the Act:

  • Plaintiff contended that her employer had engaged in the following actions: engaging in inappropriate sexual advances, eventually leading to rape.
  • Plaintiff stated that she had become involved in a sexual relationship with an officer and director of the company she worked for after repeated pressure because she feared the loss of her job. When she attempted to terminate the relationship, she alleged that he responded with increasingly threatening language, whereupon she resumed the relationship.
  • The plaintiff contended that her immediate supervisor sexually assaulted her and subjected her to both hostile environment and sexual harassment.

How the Courts Ruled

In all three cases, the courts stated that the alleged conduct was sufficient to meet the statutory requirement that a crime of violence be committed

A Successful Claim

Plaintiff was a customer of a car dealership, involved in a verbal disagreement with sales representatives who allegedly chased her from the car lot while screaming and brandishing pens.

The Result

The court reasoned that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged aggravated assault, that she was in reasonable fear of imminent bodily harm, and that writing instruments could not be eliminated as potential deadly weapons.

The Violence Against Women Act may be attractive to plaintiffs for a number of reasons:

  • Because the claim is brought against individuals, there is no requirement that the company know of the behavior before liability is possible, as under Title VII.
  • The plaintiff may proceed directly against managers and individual employees.
  • Generous monetary remedies are available.

Clearly the Violence Against Women Act is emerging as a new source of liability for workplace violence. Many of these cases have also included claims under various other laws, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Mary-Kathryn Zachary, J.D., is professor of business administration at State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, Georgia.

 
 
Toolkit
Index of Articles
Recommended Seminars
Recommended Books

 
AMA Seminars
European Seminars
Canadian Seminars
Books
Self Study
e-Learning
Research

 

 



Privacy Contact Site Map
American Management Association © Copyright 1997-2004
1601 Broadway New York, NY 10019
Phone: 212-586-8100 • Fax: 212-903-8168 • Customer Service: 1-800-262-9699